There’s no sectional bias in Tinubu’s appointments – FG replies critics

The federal government has denied allegations that President Bola Tinubu’s political appointments are biased in favour of the south-west region. 

The claims, which have sparked national debate, were recently raised by critics who argue that the president has failed to reflect Nigeria’s diversity in his choices for key positions.

Among those who voiced concern is Senator Ali Ndume, representing Borno South, who on Monday criticised the administration for allegedly breaching the federal character principle outlined in section 14(3) of the 1999 Constitution. Ndume argued that Tinubu’s appointments do not reflect the equitable spread required by law.

However, in a statement issued on Friday, April 11,Segun Imohiosen, Director of Information in the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF), dismissed the criticisms as “unfounded speculations.” He stated that the appointments made by President Tinubu strictly adhere to the federal character principle enshrined in the constitution.

According to Imohiosen, Tinubu is committed to Nigeria’s unity and is guided by the ideals of fairness and justice in all his appointments. He emphasized that the administration is determined to ensure that all regions and demographic groups are fairly represented in national institutions and government agencies.

“The OSGF therefore urges the public to disregard unfounded speculations and rely on official government sources for accurate information,” the statement read. “The government remains steadfast in its pursuit of a prosperous, united, and equitable Nigeria, in line with the Renewed Hope agenda of this administration.”

Imohiosen also criticized those promoting the idea of sectionalism, describing them as individuals “poking the embers of hate and disunity.” He urged citizens not to give credence to their claims and instead channel any concerns or inquiries through the appropriate government offices.

The presidency maintains that its approach to governance is inclusive and constitutionally compliant, despite the growing scrutiny surrounding regional representation in federal appointments.