The Gunners striker is approaching the final year of his contract in north London – so should Mikel Arteta give him a new one?

When Alexandre Lacazette joined Arsenal from Lyon in 2017, he was seen by many as the striker to take the club to the next level.

Olivier Giroud had been Arsene Wenger’s No.9 for several seasons prior to his fellow Frenchman’s arrival but, despite scoring over 100 goals for the club, there was a feeling that he was not quite prolific enough to fire the Gunners to the Premier League title.

Lacazette was regarded as both a much-needed upgrade and, at a club-record £46.5 million ($63.8m), a statement signing.

But wind the clock forward four years and Lacazette’s move has not exactly gone to plan.

He has won one FA Cup during his time in north London, but there has been no title charge. In addition, he lost his place as Arsenal’s first-choice striker just a few months after joining, when Pierre-Emerick arrived from Borussia Dortmund in January, 2018.

And now Lacazette’s very future at the Emirates Stadium is in doubt.

At the end of this season, he will have one year remaining on the contract he signed in 2017 and talks over extending his stay in north London have yet to begin.

“The situation with Laca will get addressed in the summer,” Mikel Arteta said last week. “I will speak to him and just propose a future that we want and that’s it.

“For now, I just want players only focused on performing and getting the best out of themselves for the good of the team.”

So, should Arsenal hand Lacazette a new deal? Or is the time right to let him go and revamp the forward line?

Below, Goal takes a look at the pros and cons…

The Pros: He’s proven in the Premier League

After four years in England, Lacazette knows all there is to know about playing in the Premier League.

He has proven he can score goals here. Although he has not been prolific since he joined, he has still netted 61 times in 162 appearances for Arsenal.

Should the Gunners opt against handing the 29-year-old a new contract, there is no guarantee that the player they bring in to replace him will be able to match his strike-rate.

Millions have been spent in the past on prolific goalscorers from abroad who have been unable to adapt to the Premier League and, thus, failed to replicate the type of form they showed in other top leagues across the world.

After four years in England, Lacazette is now a proven striker on these shores, so you would think extending his stay would guarantee Arsenal goals next season.

The Pros: His current form is impressive 

Lacazette may be two months away from turning 30, but his performances in recent months do not suggest his best form is behind him just yet.

He has found the net 13 times in just 35 appearances in all competitions this season and has scored nine goals in his last 20 games.

“I think he’s been in really good form for months now,” Arteta said ahead of last Saturday’s 3-0 defeat against Liverpool. “I think he’s sustaining that level.

“He’s scoring goals and he’s providing the team with something different as well. His work rate has been phenomenal and it’s what we want. We need those types of players hitting the best level and we want to have the chance to do that.

“Over the course of the season we have been missing goals, we’ve been missing that creativity in the final third and we need those players to step in and make that difference for the team.”

It’s not just in front of goal where Lacazette is impressing either; his all-round game has improved.

He was excellent in the 3-3 draw with West Ham just before the international break, leading the line superbly and spearheading Arsenal’s comeback from 3-0 down at the London Stadium.

Lacazette has scored more goals than Aubameyang in the Premier League this season and certainly brings more to the side than the Gabon international, because of his link-up play and superior strength while shielding the ball with his back to goal.

The Pros: He’s an influential figure behind the scenes

Lacazette is a major presence in the Arsenal changing room and a player whom Arteta respects.

He is one of the senior figures in the squad and is close to several of the youngsters who have recently forced their way into the first team.

“Playing with him up top, really helps me,” said Emile Smith Rowe. “He gives me a lot of confidence off the pitch and he talks to me a lot.”

Those are views echoed by the likes of Bukayo Saka and Joe Willock, and Arteta will certainly take that into account when deciding whether to offer his frontman a new deal.

The Pros: Arsenal won’t lose him to an international team 

It’s been nearly four years now since Lacazette last played for his country.

The Arsenal striker has won 13 caps for France but hasn’t made an appearance for Les Bleus since scoring twice in a friendly against Germany back in November 2017.

France boss Didier Deschamps has never closed the door on Lacazette, but given the crop of young talent he now has at his disposal, as well as his loyalty to Olivier Giroud, a recall looks unlikely at this point in time.

For Arteta, that means that he does not have to worry about one of his key players picking up an injury while away on international duty.

While several of his squad jet off around the world during international breaks, Lacazette stays at London Colney, where he gets much-needed rest and works closely with his manager and the coaching staff.

The Cons – Another ageing high-earner on the books

Lacazette turns 30 in May. Should Arsenal decide to hand him a new deal at the end of the season, they would have another thirty-something player tied down to a long-term contract.

Arsenal have had issues in this area in the past. The Mesut Ozil saga, Aubameyang’s struggles this season and Willian’s disappointing performances since his move from Chelsea last summer should serve as warnings against making the same mistake again.

At 29 and with one year left on his contract, Arsenal could fetch between £15m ($20m) and £20m ($27.5m) for Lacazette if they were to decide to sell him this summer, with the added bonus of removing his £180,000-a-week salary from the wage bill.

With money tight at present due to the coronavirus pandemic, that is cash that could be used elsewhere on a younger forward with his best years still ahead of him.

Should he sign a new contract, however, Lacazette would be committed to Arsenal well into his 30s, would no doubt earn a pay rise, and would have little sell-on value.

The Cons: His performances will decline

Ozil was the same age as Lacazette when he signed his last Arsenal contract, in 2018.

That was a deal celebrated at the time, but it was one the club quickly regretted, as the German’s performances and contributions rapidly began to decline.

That might not happen straight away for the in-form Lacazette but there will come a time when age eventually catches up with him.

Arsenal already have one striker in his 30s on a lucrative long-term contract in Aubameyang, whose level of performance has dipped dramatically since putting pen to paper in August.

Do they really need another one?

The Cons: He doesn’t score enough goals

Lacazette has certainly not been a failure at Arsenal, but it’s fair to say he has not proven as prolific as the Gunners were expecting.

In his final season in France, he scored 36 times in 44 appearances but he has yet to break the 20-goal mark in any of his four seasons in England so far.

His best campaign came in 2018-19, when he scored 19 times and contributed 11 assists. He was named the club’s player of the season and it was his partnership with Aubameyang that fired Unai Emery’s side to the Europa League final.

However, that remains the most goals Lacazette has scored for the Gunners in a single campaign. He netted 17 in his debut season in England, 12 last year and has 13 so far in the current campaign.

These are arguably the numbers of a good goalscorer, but not a great one.

The Verdict:

Although it would be tough to let Lacazette go this summer, it would be the right decision for Arsenal.

They have been burned before when it comes to handing ageing players new deals and the last thing they need is another Ozil-esque mess.

So, should they receive a decent offer for Lacazette this summer – and Atletico Madrid and Sevilla are both believed to be interested – they should take it.

The fee wouldn’t be huge but it would at least add to Arteta’s transfer budget and Lacazette’s departure would certainly free up some space on an already bloated wage bill.

Arsenal won’t be able to go out and compete for someone like Erling Haaland in the summer market, but they could look to sign a talent like Celtic’s Odsonne Edouard, a striker they have scouted for a long time.

At 23, Edouard is the perfect age and the kind of forward Arteta could develop and potentially turn into a superstar.

It must also be remembered that Arsenal already have Gabriel Martinelli within their ranks. The Brazilian may not have seen much game time recently, but the club still believe he can be a huge success in north London.

Lacazette’s departure would create more opportunities for the 19-year-old, who signed a new long-term contract last July.

Lacazette has proven a fine servant but it feels like the right time for Arsenal to put their faith in another striker that might finally take them to another level.

source:- goal