Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine - 9jaflaver





Light Dark

WELCOME TO 9JAFLAVER

PREMIUM BEATS  |  NEWS  |  SOCCER LIVE-SCORE   |  MOVIES   |  +18 ADULT LEAKS   |   INSTALL 9JAFLAVER MUSIC APP   |  HOTTEST 100 SONGS  |  SPORTS  |  CELEBRITY GIST  |  MIXTAPE  |  JOKES  |  LATEST COMEDY VIDEOS  |  NIGERIAN MUSIC ARTISTES  |  









Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine



The supreme court says the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) “failed woefully” to tender documents it claimed were genuine in the Imo governorship election case.


The court said this in its ruling on the petitions on the 2019 Imo governorship poll.


TheCable has obtained full text of the verdict which has not been made public since January 14 when the apex court ordered the sack of Emeka Ihedioha.


The All Progressives Congress (APC) and Hope Uzodinma, its governorship candidate, had challenged the declaration of Ihedioha, Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, as the winner of the March election.


Uzodinma and his party had argued that the election results from 388 polling units where he got majority votes were excluded when INEC announced the final tally.


The APC and its candidate sought the inclusion of those votes and after losing at the tribunal and appeal court, their prayer was granted by the supreme court.
In the aftermath of the court’s verdict, the legal team of Ihedioha said the judgement was based on false grounds.


His lawyers also said INEC tendered documents to show that the evidence by Uzodinma and his party were false.
However, the court, did not agree with Ihedioha and his party on the claim.


“As regards the 3rd respondent, it failed woefully to tender the results it termed ‘genuine’, which would have rebutted the presumption of regularity in favour of the documents tendered by the appellants,” the panel held.


The apex court also said the appellants – Uzodinma and APC – discharged the burden on them of proving that 388 polling units which were excluded at the collation favoured them.


“This court does not lightly set aside concurrent findings of the two lower courts. It will however, disturb those findings where it is satisfied that there is an apparent error on the face of the record of proceedings,” it held.







Promote Article, Music, Video, Comedy Skit & Virals
Call: +2348143945195 Or +2349027283345

Whatsapp: +2348143945195





















Comment Below:-

Enter Name Below (Optional)

         
Enter Comment Below:-


ATTENTION!! CAN'T FIND THE SONG YOU ARE LOOKING FOR? INSTALL 9JAFLAVER GO APP NOW TO GET ALL MUSIC, STREAM AND DOWNLOAD LEGALLY, AND LET YOUR FAVOURITE ARTISTS GET PAID ROYALTIES (CLICK HERE)




Promoted Songs





DMCA.com Protection Status

© 2014-2023 9jaflaver. All Rights Reserved.


About us | DMCA | Privacy Policy | Contact us

| Advertise| Request For Music | Terms Of Service


9jaflaver is not responsible for the content of external sites.